Milo Yiannopoulos has a LOT of “Super Fans” but no one else Grabs Life by the Grapefruit and Squeezes quite as good as Michah: one such fan.
On a recent dare, Milo informed Michah he would let him regain his Admin rights (if he completed a dare) back to Milo’s “Fag Chat” the room that up until now has been a pay only chat room, with changing names.
For example, Milo has mocked a church, mocked Antifa, mocked a school, and currently, Milo sits as “Judge Milo” the current link at the time of this article is: https://t.me/joinchat/LHoLt1A8PXVPq2ml9_qNyA remember in his court it is NOT a Democracy.
Recently Milo has complained a lot about the lack of book sales, etc, etc and the worries of putting food on the table for him and his wonderful husband as pictured below (not really)
I will be honest I myself have been caught up in the drama of the world of Milo, I even paid $13 to be “unsilenced,” yes Milo has found a way to make money off this chat, fees levied on those that disobey. Yes, Milo will “silence” you, the same Milo, who is the master of being banned from everything which I find kind of ironic to be “silenced” by one that complains how everyone silences him. If I might add Milo has even set up a system where people can pay to have others banned and then reinstated, and that is not even all! Just ask anyone in chat about the “rules” especially #ShariaTuesdays where women are NOT allowed to talk. It can be frustrating for some, but in Milo’s Kingdom, he likes to keep it fresh.
I have even allowed myself to get very emotional about his rejection of my work, and my silencing. So, I have put that energy into a weekly show covering some of the highs and very very very lows of Milo’s chat.
This week started out normal as there was a Mock Funeral for Michah, but within 12 hours Michah was made whole again in at least zombie form… which led towards an even fruitier and more citrus path for dear Michah the budding fruitiphile. (I am sure there is a much better not made up name)
For you see in 2020 the land of complaining about Gays and Drag queens (just ask Lady Maga) being allowed in the “Conservative” movement because they are something other than “traditional conservative” is a LARGE issue for many who consider themselves as “conservatives”
This is something I personally believe that is holding back the Republicans and our #GaysForTrump movement, in general, the embracing of diversity in the party which may just include getting OK with embracing identity politics. If only to prove to others that they too do not have to be trapped on the left and can #GoRight breaking the “Traditional mold” and ensuring future victories for Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Though, just as bad as Trannys in Libraries we have to warn you that there is such a thing as extremism. This we all must worry about and guard against.
So my question, does Sex With Fruit belong in Conservative America?
Who knows, I know this for sure.. people might call me a fruit because I am Gay but I sure as hell am not having sex with one!
To each his own Michah for I hope you do get that piece of American Pie!
Also, Remember, Milo is NOT OK! All Right?!
Below is this week’s 1st ever episode of Milo is Not OK! All Right?! Enjoy and Subscribe https://YouTube.com/c/PeterBoykin
Milo Is Not OK! All Right?! Episode 1
Fighting the Culture War One Grapefruit at a Time
Michah Screws a Grapefruit!
I told you Milo was NOT All Right…
Warning Contents are UNCENSORED
Strong Language and some weird situations… not for all ages
#MiloIsNotOk #MiloIsNotAllRight #CultureWar
Fighting the Culture War One Grapefruit at a Time – Milo Is Not OK (All Right) Episode 1
The Opinions Expressed in These News Stories, do not always represent the views of the Full Staff, and the Movements and Charities We Endorse.
We Fully Believe that Together All Parties and People Can Make America (and the World) Great Always (For Everyone)
Follow @PeterBoykin on
Visit Our Network of News Pages:
Support These Great Charities and Movements
“I believe that we in the United States Congress should start impeachment proceedings. Immediately,” he said, adding: “The politics of this be dammed. When we look at history at what happened when the president started acting like an authoritarian. The question is what will we have done? And I believe the Congress should do its job.” “I just want to make sure whatever we do doesn’t end up with an acquittal by [Senate Majority Leader] Mitch McConnell in the Senate and President Trump is saying he was acquitted by the Congress. I belief we have a moral obligation to beat Donald Trump. He has to be a single term president. And we can’t do anything that plays into his hands.” But Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet was more cautious.
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said “It’s obvious the president committed the crimes worthy of impeachment.” Sen. Kamala Harris of California, who has said her Justice Department, if elected president, would go forward with obstruction of justices charges against Trump, was the first to elaborate. “We all watched the testimony [former special counsel Robert Muelle], I read the report,” she said. “There are 10 clear incidents of obstruction of justice by this president and he needs to be held accountable. I have seen people go to prison for far less.” Sen. Corey Booker of New Jersey agreed. Former Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development also was in favor of punishment. “I was first of candidate to call on Congress to begin impeachment proceedings,” he said, adding: “I believe that the evidence is plain and clear. And if it goes that far, you’re likely to see a prosecution of Donald Trump.” The progressive Democrats on the stage Wednesday night for the second round of debates among presidential candidates were all in favor of tossing President Donald Trump in jail.
In January, Coats again was reportedly in Trump’s dog house when he told a Senate committee that North Korea was unlikely to give up its nuclear weapons, which contradicted the president’s more optimistic view. At last year’s Aspen Security Forum, Coats reportedly angered Trump when he appeared to criticize the president’s ties with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer slammed on Sunday President Donald Trump’s choice of Rep. John Ratcliffe to replace Dan Coats as director of national intelligence, The Hill reported. “It’s clear that Rep. Ratcliffe was selected because he exhibited blind loyalty to President Trump with his demagogic questioning of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller ” Schumer said in a statement. “If Senate Republicans elevate such a partisan player to a position that requires intelligence expertise and non-partisanship, it would be a big mistake.” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wrote on Twitter that the successor for Coats “must put patriotism before politics, and remember that his oath is to protect the Constitution and the American people, not the President.” Trump had reportedly soured on Coats several times during his tenure. Axios reported that Trump was impressed by Ratcliffe’s performance during his questioning of Mueller at congressional hearings on Wednesday. Sen Eliabeth Warren, who is running for the Democratic nomination for president in 2020, added in a tweet that “Our Director of National Intelligence should be above partisan politics, speak truth to power, and resist Trump’s abuses of authority. John Ratcliffe doesn’t fit that bill.” It is not yet clear how the Senate overall will react to Ratcliffe’s nomination, according to The Hill. However, his membership in the House Intelligence Committee will likely appeal to Republican senators.